QUEEN V. EKPATA & 2 ORS.
IN THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA ON THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 1957 BEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS JIBOWU, Ag F.C.J DE LESTANG, F.J HUBBARD, Ag F.J THE QUEEN RESPONDENT V. 1. SAMUEL AMO EKPATA 2. ROBERT OMOGE APPELLANTS 3. JOSEPH AKWE F.S.C/152/1956 EVIDENCE-Evidence of Accomplice-Suspicious circumstance – propriety of using same as evidence of corroboration. FACTS/BACKGROUND:
AJAYI V. FISHER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA ON THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 1956 BEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS JIBOWU T, Ag., F.C.J., DE LESTANG, F.J., HUBBARD, Ag., F.J. BETWEEN: J. A. AJAYI APPELLANT AND A. OLU FISHER RESPONDENT EVIDENCE—Inadmissible evidence, in
AYIWOH V. AKOREDE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA ON THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 1951 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP ROBINSON, J., J.S.C. BETWEEN: AYIWOH APPELLANT AND HADJI AKOREDE RESPONDENT EVIDENCE – power of attorney – attested by solicitor’s clerk – effect of EVIDENCE – notice to quit – served by solicitor orally – effect of EVIDENCE ORDINANCE- Section 118
Ayiwoh v. Hadji Akorede
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIAON THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 1951BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP ROBINSON, J., J.S.C. BETWEEN: AYIWOH APPELLANT AND HADJI AKOREDE RESPONDENT EVIDENCE – power of attorney – attested by solicitor’s clerk – effect of EVIDENCE – notice to quit – served by solicitor orally – effect of EVIDENCE ORDINANCE- Section 118 (Now S.